\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{\textbf{Effect of No-Excuse Absentee Voting on Party Turnout in 2020.}\label{tab:party_in_tx}}
\begin{tabular}{lccc|ccc}
\toprule \toprule
& \multicolumn{3}{c}{\underline{Texas}} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{\underline{Indiana}} \\[1mm]
& \multicolumn{3}{c}{Dem \% of Turnout [0-100]} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Dem \% of Turnout [0-100]}\\[1mm]
& (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) \\
\midrule
No-Excuse (Age $\geq$ 65) & 0.22 & -0.57 & -0.39 & 0.53 & 0.42 & -0.84\\
 & (0.14) & (0.21) & (0.13) & (0.28) & (0.42) & (0.26) \\[2mm]
\# Obs &  391,619 & 3,714,875 & 6,387,178 &  116,771 & 1,092,475 & 1,829,944\\[1mm]
Ages Included & 64-65 & 55-75 & 45-85 & 64-65 & 55-75 & 45-85  \\
Age Specification & -- & Cubic & Cubic & -- & Cubic & Cubic \\
\bottomrule \bottomrule
\multicolumn{7}{p{.9\textwidth}}{\footnotesize Robust standard errors in parentheses.
Columns 1 and 4 present the simple difference in means for voters aged 65 vs. 64.
Columns 2-3 and 5-6 present estimates that include a broader range of ages and 
adjust for age trends using cubic specifications of age estimated separately on either side
 of the discontinuity.}
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
